February 27, 2026
|

Moonwell, Truebit & MSCST Exploits — $28.53M Lost to Oracle, Overflow & Flash Loan Failures

In Brief

  • Moonwell lost $1.8M after a mispriced oracle undervalued cbETH.
  • Truebit lost $26.6M due to an integer overflow.
  • MSCST lost $130K after a flash loan manipulated pool pricing.

Hacks Analysis

Moonwell | Amount Lost: $1.8M

On February 15th, the Moonwell exploit on Base and Optimism resulted in a $1.8M loss. The root cause was a misconfigured oracle introduced through Moonwell’s MIP-X43 update. The cbETH/USD price was calculated using only the cbETH/ETH exchange rate, without multiplying by the ETH/USD feed. This caused cbETH to be priced at roughly $1.12 instead of around $2,200. Liquidation bots exploited the mispricing, leaving Moonwell with $1.8M bad debt.

Exploited Contract (on Base): 0x2ae3f1ec7f1f5012cfeab0185bfc7aa3cf0dec22

Transaction: 0x2f4ff77c77ce2a52c80fcd59a4cac4b05f4285afe1f3b92118b0a004a325953c

Truebit | Amount Lost: $26.6M

On January 8th, the Truebit exploit on the Ethereum mainnet resulted in a $26.6M loss. The root cause was an integer overflow in the getPurchasePrice() function. The function computes token price via (v12 + v9) / v6, where both v12 and v9 were values close to the uint256 maximum. Their sum overflowed back to near zero, causing the division to return 0. Since the getPurchasePrice() function returned zero, the attacker was able to mint 240 million TRU tokens at no cost.

Exploited Contract: 0xc186e6f0163e21be057e95aa135edd52508d14d3

Transaction: 0xcd4755645595094a8ab984d0db7e3b4aabde72a5c87c4f176a030629c47fb014

MSCST | Amount Lost: $130K

On December 29th, the MSCST exploit on BSC resulted in a $130K loss. The root cause was a price manipulation vulnerability. The attacker flash loaned 46.8M GPC tokens and deposited them into the GPC/WBNB PancakeSwap pool, artificially manipulating the GPC price. The attacker repaid the flash loan within the same transaction and made 149 BNB in profit.

Transaction (BNB): 0x6c9ed4c2d81b6abfdf297b0cbc13585ed91f2a5e69e3545d3ea4316f50021b56

What’s a Rich Text element?

The rich text element allows you to create and format headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, images, and video all in one place instead of having to add and format them individually. Just double-click and easily create content.

A rich text element can be used with static or dynamic content. For static content, just drop it into any page and begin editing. For dynamic content, add a rich text field to any collection and then connect a rich text element to that field in the settings panel. Voila!

Headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, figures, images, and figure captions can all be styled after a class is added to the rich text element using the "When inside of" nested selector system.

  1. Follow-up: Conduct a follow-up review to ensure that the remediation steps were effective and that the smart contract is now secure.
  2. Follow-up: Conduct a follow-up review to ensure that the remediation steps were effective and that the smart contract is now secure.

In Brief

  • Remitano suffered a $2.7M loss due to a private key compromise.
  • GAMBL’s recommendation system was exploited.
  • DAppSocial lost $530K due to a logic vulnerability.
  • Rocketswap’s private keys were inadvertently deployed on the server.

Hacks

Hacks Analysis

Huobi  |  Amount Lost: $8M

On September 24th, the Huobi Global exploit on the Ethereum Mainnet resulted in a $8 million loss due to the compromise of private keys. The attacker executed the attack in a single transaction by sending 4,999 ETH to a malicious contract. The attacker then created a second malicious contract and transferred 1,001 ETH to this new contract. Huobi has since confirmed that they have identified the attacker and has extended an offer of a 5% white hat bounty reward if the funds are returned to the exchange.

Exploit Contract: 0x2abc22eb9a09ebbe7b41737ccde147f586efeb6a

Ready to Shift Security Assurance In-House? Talk to Our Security Experts Today.