November 3, 2025
|
Developer-First Security

Case Study: Olympix vs. Slither: Static Analysis Results

Intro

In Web3 security, the difference between a good static analyzer and a great one isn't measured in features; it's measured in vulnerabilities caught and false alarms eliminated.

We put this to the test by running Olympix and Slither head-to-head on EigenLayer's production contracts: 53 files, nearly 12,000 lines of code, and real-world complexity that separates institutional-grade tools from the rest.

Olympix Static Analysis

Olympix has the only institutional-grade static analyzer for Web3.

Its proprietary architecture (including a custom compiler, intermediate representation (IR), and custom detectors) enables it to find a higher absolute number of true positives than other static analyzers, perform deeper analysis, and handle infinitely large and complex codebases in under one second with real-time updates.

The same engine also powers the most robust security tool suite in Web3, including unit test generation, mutation testing, fuzzing, and automated formal verification, as well as the most effective internal audit agent on the market.

Slither

Slither is an open-source static analyzer for Solidity. It is written in Python, has not been actively maintained in recent years, and uses a limited detector framework that struggles with complex, modern smart contract architectures.

Learn More: Comparing Olympix and Slither on the Eigen Layer Code Base: Enterprise-Grade Static Analysis vs. Open-Source Alternatives

Experiment Setup

We ran a direct comparison on the main branch of the eigenlayer-contracts repository, containing 53 non-interface contracts and libraries and 11,981 lines of code.

Results show a dramatic accuracy gap:

Olympix’s static analyzer found 3 True Positives and 23 False Positives, compared to Slither’s 0 True Positives and 150 False Positives.

AI Layer Results

But it gets better. With Olympix’ new AI Confidence Slider (currently in private alpha) turned all the way up, Olympix returned zero false positives - maintaining 100% precision and recall.

Conclusion

The results speak for themselves.

Olympix is the only static analyzer purpose-built for institutional Web3 security - combining deeper analysis with real-time AI-driven precision.

By catching more real vulnerabilities and eliminating false positives, Olympix ensures teams ship faster, safer, and with higher confidence than ever before.

See the spreadsheet with the full dataset here.

Call to Action

Make sure your team is using Olympix’s full suite of institutional-grade security tools today - including our:

  • static analyzer
  • unit test generation
  • mutation testing
  • fuzzing meets automated formal verification tool
  • the most powerful internal audit agent on the market 

- and join the waitlist to get early access to the AI Confidence Slider before public release.

What’s a Rich Text element?

The rich text element allows you to create and format headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, images, and video all in one place instead of having to add and format them individually. Just double-click and easily create content.

A rich text element can be used with static or dynamic content. For static content, just drop it into any page and begin editing. For dynamic content, add a rich text field to any collection and then connect a rich text element to that field in the settings panel. Voila!

Headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, figures, images, and figure captions can all be styled after a class is added to the rich text element using the "When inside of" nested selector system.

  1. Follow-up: Conduct a follow-up review to ensure that the remediation steps were effective and that the smart contract is now secure.
  2. Follow-up: Conduct a follow-up review to ensure that the remediation steps were effective and that the smart contract is now secure.

In Brief

  • Remitano suffered a $2.7M loss due to a private key compromise.
  • GAMBL’s recommendation system was exploited.
  • DAppSocial lost $530K due to a logic vulnerability.
  • Rocketswap’s private keys were inadvertently deployed on the server.

Hacks

Hacks Analysis

Huobi  |  Amount Lost: $8M

On September 24th, the Huobi Global exploit on the Ethereum Mainnet resulted in a $8 million loss due to the compromise of private keys. The attacker executed the attack in a single transaction by sending 4,999 ETH to a malicious contract. The attacker then created a second malicious contract and transferred 1,001 ETH to this new contract. Huobi has since confirmed that they have identified the attacker and has extended an offer of a 5% white hat bounty reward if the funds are returned to the exchange.

Exploit Contract: 0x2abc22eb9a09ebbe7b41737ccde147f586efeb6a

More from Olympix:

No items found.

Ready to Shift Security Assurance In-House? Talk to Our Security Experts Today.